Wednesday, 24 January 2007

LHOOQ


It appears not to be a stretch to say that this is "Duchamp's most famous ready-made" (Ramirez 46). Many people, including those outside of academia, recognize this now infamous image as inextricably attached to Marcel Duchamp.
This cheap reproduction of the famous ideal of beauty that is Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa has been adorned with a comical moustache and goatee, thus deserving its alternate title Joconde aux Moustaches. L.H.O.O.Q. is two-dimensional, like only several other Readymades including Apolinere Enameled, Pharmacy, and French Military Paper.
The title is essentially a phonetic game. As Duchamp himself noted in a 1966 interview, "I really like this kind of game, because I find that you can do a lot of them. By simply reading the letters in French, even in any language, some astonishing things happen" (Cabanne 63). When read quickly in French, the title L.H.O.O.Q. sounds like a sentence translating to "She has a hot bum/ass." This is the most commonly sited meaning of the phrase, but many other ideas also surround this intriguing group of letters. Duchamp gave a "loose" translation of L.H.O.O.Q. as "there is fire down below" in a late interview (Schwarz 203). Steefel points out that, when spoken in English, L.H.O.O.Q. sounds like "LOOK" (50). Thus the piece could have a further function as a commentary on the relationship between artist and viewer, which Duchamp was admittedly very interested in. Kuspit supports a much more overtly sexual interpretation, explaining, "It is a multilayered pun: the letters become words which become a devaluing male comment on the beautiful, dignified woman - she's just another slut. She's smiling because she's thinking of being fucked - more probably, of masturbating, that is, fucking herself" ("Laugh" 111).
The viewer should be wary of reading too far into something that is really only grounded in speculation. Could the artist have not intended such a reading? We may never know for sure, but Philip Larson argues an interesting point (although without citing a source for this fact, his assertion seems just as ungrounded as the speculations he argues against): "Not found in most writings about Duchamp is the faintly amusing fact that Duchamp intended us to read the inscription as a series of enunciated French letters, like O.U.R.A.Q.T. in English. The Duchamp blurb comes out as something more unforgivable than 'She has a hot ass'" (213).
Finally, Duchamp's choice of the Mona Lisa may not have been as arbitrary as often assumed. There may be a more personal reason why Duchamp focused on this particular example of ideal aesthetic beauty. Duchamp's friend Guillaume Apollinaire was falsely detained in connection with the theft of the Mona Lisa and some small sculptures from the Louvre several years prior to Duchamp's creation of this Readymade. This may be Duchamp's way of indirectly referencing his friend Apollinaire.

Tuesday, 23 January 2007

The outline of my essay

The topic of my essay will be based on the idea of appropriation in art; this form of art has been existing for around hundred years, and it has become so widely used today.


I will firstly define the concept of appropriation in art, and explore the history of it.

Appropriation often refers to the use of borrowed elements in the creation of new work. The borrowed elements may include images, forms or styles from art history or from popular culture; it also can be materials and techniques from non-art contexts.
Since the 1980s the term has also referred more specifically to quoting the work of another artist to create a new work. The new work may or may not alter the original.
Appropriated materials were first employed in Picasso and Braque’s collages using chair cane, oil cloths, objects of the real world, in their still-lives, challenging preconceived notions about representation in art work.

Secondly, I would like to apply the art theory into this form of art which has become more popular in recent decades.

Meaning
Sign
Representation

Thirdly, I intend to demonstrate some art pieces and try to explore and interpret the meaning behind it.

· LHOOQ created by Duchamp, reproduction of Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa with added mustache and goatee.










· ‘Twelve angry woman’ made by British artist Jonathan Monk from an unknown artist.










etc...


Finally, I also would like to discuss the Appropriation art and its copyrights.

The nature of appropriation art, the borrowing of elements for new work, brings up a number of contentious copyright issues.
One debate addresses the extent to which appropriation art has sufficient originality.

The definition of appropriation art

Appropriation art means to appropriate something involves taking possession of it. In the visual arts, the term appropriation often refers to the use of borrowed elements in the creation of new work. The borrowed elements may include images, forms or styles from art history or from popular culture, or materials and techniques from non-art contexts. Since the1980s the term has also referred more specifically to quoting the work of another artist to create a new work. The new work may or may not alter the original.

the tiltle of my essay

'Appropriation art' will be the tiltle of my theory eassy. I have been seen too many appropriation arts recently, I was confused about wheather the work is legal or illegal, but i found a lot of work has been published on books, and the publishers normally do not want to take any risk regards to the copyright matter, so now i have stopped thinking about this.

In the pratical way, it seems meaningless, the worst thing is the artist using somebody else work without knowing the meaning behind, the originally work has been totally destoried, if I apply the theory on, it does more and more make sense, the meaningless work becames meanful.